cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It really is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
However, In the event the same person were charged with section 300 and 302, their defence that they never meant to kill the person – and that they just wished to injure them or incapacitate them –, will fall short, as being the elements of the offence only need the intent to cause injury to get proven, not the intention to cause death.
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may possibly search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Deterrence: The concern of severe repercussions, which include capital punishment, is meant to deter likely criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is important in reducing the event of intentional killings.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're with the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally audio, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case from the petitioners for promotion can be deemed, however, we've been very clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, subject to availability of vacancy subject matter towards the approval with the competent authority.
The presiding judge emphasised check here the need to address the evolving techniques employed by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological aspects allows for the more complete legal response.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for that accused who intentionally murdered the target.
6. Mere involvement in a heinous offence is not any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for your concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, because then He's powering the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is not any more needed for further investigation, therefore, his continual incarceration would not serve any effective purpose at this stage.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, such as eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of the seized currency.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station as a consequence of possible health risks and hazards.
Alternative Punishment: In some cases, the court may have the discretion to award life imprisonment being an alternative to the death penalty. Life imprisonment involves the offender spending the remainder of their life at the rear of bars without the possibility of parole or early release.
this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion of your petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
Seek out websites affiliated with trustworthy legal institutions or organizations. Confirm the information against other sources when possible.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil regulation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]